On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 17:06, David Blevins wrote: > A final thing to consider is license. To be clear, GPL is _NOT_ Open > Source(sm). The Open Source Initiative (Eric Raymond) and the Free Software > Foundation (Richard Stallman) are two opposed groups, they don't get along > too well. > > Apache, FreeBSD, and Mozilla have true Open Source(sm) licenses. > Anything GNU is GPL free software, though the source is open, it's not an > Open Source(sm) approved license -- nor will it ever be as long as Richard > is alive. This is not true: http://opensource.org/docs/definition.html