On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:09:59AM +0100, Thomas Eibner wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:50:46PM -0600, Chad C. Walstrom wrote: > [Cut] > > ...how...about...all...the...extra...quoted...text.... > > What about the all the text you sent once MORE! And all the OTHER mails. > Why not try to give a nice hint in private mail instead of writing back > to the list each time? I did that on purpose to prove a point. Obviously it didn't translate well in your sarcasm interpretor. There's a new upstream version at ftp://find.humor.here.org/pub/sarcint/sarcint-cvs-20011218.tar.gz. Why don't I just send it as a private email? Public humiliation of offendors on an email list bring public attention to a public problem. Send email to a list, play by the rules of netiquette. Regardless, I'm playing around with scoring in procmail. I'll soon have a working ruleset for Mail/tclug/list/2001-12/hall-of-shame/. I'll also be experimenting with adding X-Procmail-Score: headers to all emails I receive. Something to quote with. ;-) Perhaps we should write up a Netiquette Hall of Shame scoreboard for www.mn-linux.org ;-) Anyway, back to work... or lunch. Yeah, lunch would be good. -- Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net> | a.k.a. ^chewie http://www.wookimus.net/ | s.k.a. gunnarr Get my public key, ICQ#, etc. $(mailx -s 'get info' chewie at wookimus.net) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20011219/78bdd403/attachment.pgp