On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:46:21AM -0800, Paul Harris wrote: > Because it's ... umm ... stable. :) OK, that's a bit lame because > 2.4 seems to have proven itself by now, but Debian is deliberately > conservative, and therefore dependable (Kind of like Strom Thurmond? > - not necesarily what you want, but at least you know what it is. > The conservative bit translates directly). So we have the following relations: stable => Bush frozen => Gore unstable => Nader ? :-) -- johntrammell at yahoo.com | 78BA 706C C5F9 9321 E7C4 933B D063 907B A88E 924B Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List (TCLUG) Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org