I read the article. It looks fairly involved. A great idea, but you really have to go all the way around your thumb to get to your finger though. The "virus scanner" is just a mail forwarder. I am sure some of you folks could make huge improvements on its implementation. That is my opinion. * Shawn (fertch at mninter.net) wrote: > On Friday 07 December 2001 20:50, natecars at real-time.com wrote: > > I do, however, use amavis to hook mail delivery through the virus scanner. > > You wouldn't believe how many I can get. :) > > > This month's Linux Journal has what looks like a great write up on how to > scan mail for viruses. Haven't read it yet, but looks interesting. > > > Shawn > _______________________________________________ > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > Spencer Butler Twin Cities Open Systems 6126368989 at voicestream.net | spencer at autonomous.tv http://tcos.stderr.net | http://autonomous.tv Key fingerprint = 173B 8760 E59F DBF8 6FD2 68F8 ABA2 AB08 49C7 4754 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20011210/320e9e4d/attachment.pgp