On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:03:38AM -0500, Nate Carlson wrote: >Don't _need_ 512mb+, but it sure helps performance. :) The main thing is >VMWare sessions.. a Win2k session + a couple Linux sessions can suck up >memory pretty quick. I guess I can see that. After doing a bit of research/asking around (thanks Ben) I found out that according to Rik Van Reil (VM layer), in 2.4 a minimum of 2x the RAM or none at all is the only 2 options that won't fsck up your mem usage. Which really really sucks. Thanks, -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20010816/706a3efc/attachment.pgp