I'd gladly consider Real-Time, but the prices on their web page for 512/640 w/ fixed IP appear *way* more ($210) than I am currently paying Qwest (~$45 iirc). Am I misreading something here? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Sherman" <dsherman at real-time.com> To: <tclug-list at mn-linux.org>; "Lowe, Jason" <jason.lowe at cit-net.com> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 10:21 PM Subject: Re: [TCLUG] (no subject) > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > The impending switch to MSN is why I just moved my access from Qwest to > Real-Time. Up until then, I actually had good service from Qwest, and > probably would not have changed. Then again, I'm glad I was "forced" to > change, cuz the crew at R-T rocks! ;-) > > Dave Sherman > > On Friday 03 August 2001 13:18, thus spake Lowe, Jason: > > Exactly. the last time I checked I could use any ISP I wanted. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nate Carlson [mailto:natecars at real-time.com] > > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 1:19 PM > > To: tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] (no subject) > > > > On Fri, 3 Aug 2001 swalkup at isd.net wrote: > > > http://www.qwest.net/nav4/msn/faq.html > > > > > > Kinda glad I don't have DSL in my area yet. > > > > Ah, but even if you did have DSL in the area, why would you use > > Qwest/MSN as your ISP? :) > > - -- > "Nihil tam munitum quod non expugnari pecunia possit." (No > fortification is such that it cannot be subdued with money.) > - - Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 B.C. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE7a2pRA68l26XsZUYRAuWaAKDARrchFmTfjgsY9JAvUmUM59ZHvwCg3zx5 > 1d2AboXv9QJUL+/wnJKC41I= > =IHTr > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > tclug-list mailing list > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > >