Quoting Gabe Turner (dopp at acm.cs.umn.edu): > Which one were you trying to compile (sparc, sparc64, sparcv9)? Sparc > seems to implicitly mean 32-bit Sparcs in this particular context. Sparc64 > is, well, 64-bit Sparcs. Sparcv9 - you got me. "An Ultra" could mean > any ultra. Is it an Ultra 1, 2, 5, 10, 60, or 80? Ultra 1s, 2s, 5s, and > 10s are 32-bit. The rest are 64-bit, IIRC. glibc < 2.2 does not support 64-bit SPARC glib >= 2.2 does support it After looking through redhat's web site I finally posted a bug and was promptly flamed for not knowing this. :-) For thoses intersted: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18373 -- Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com> | Phone : (612)943-8700 http://www.mn-linux.org | Fax : (612)943-8500 Key fingerprint = 6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe at mn-linux.org For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help at mn-linux.org