On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 04:54:28PM -0600, Ben Lutgens wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 01:53:40PM -0600, Bob Tanner wrote: > >If I put tanner at real-time.com in the body of my message mailman does not hack > >it. > > there is a "Hide real address of sender" which replaces it with the listname > option. as well as a "Show member addresses so they're not recognizable as > email addresses" option on the Privacy portion of the admin stuff on the web > interface. Won't these do what you need? "Hide real address of sender" is reply-to-list on steroids; it leaves you with no way to tell who sent a message. "Show member addresses so they're not recognizable as email addresses" lightly mungs addresses which are displayed in member lists - it doesn't even get the sender header in the archives. Neither one will touch addresses embedded in the body of a message. -- "Two words: Windows survives." - Craig Mundie, Microsoft senior strategist "So does syphillis. Good thing we have penicillin." - Matthew Alton Geek Code 3.1: GCS d? s+: a- C++ UL++$ P++>+++ L+++>++++ E- W--(++) N+ o+ !K w---$ O M- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t 5++ X+ R++ tv b+ DI++++ D G e* h+ r y+