> 600mb drive that could be a problem. (*coughbastardcough* ;) Take it > down to 128mb or something and give us some numbers... What? And destroy my manly 512MB ego? NEVER! I'll consider 256MB, but it'll have to be right after a fight where I whoop some ass, or while drinking shots of everclear to maintain a "virtual 512MB ego". :) > -----Original Message----- > From: Callum Lerwick [mailto:lerwick at tcfreenet.org] > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 12:44 PM > To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > Subject: Re: [TCLUG] REAL Verbatim drive Q (: > > > "Austad, Jay" wrote: > > > > > Next time, do your test with 2x or more the amount of ram. > > > > I would have, but I wanted to test the FS's on the MO > drive. I have 512MB > > of RAM in that box. I guess I could have cranked the size > up as high as > > possible though. > > You need to test with a file at least twice the size of RAM > so that high > level OS caching doesn't mess with the results. But with > 512mb RAM and a > 600mb drive that could be a problem. (*coughbastardcough* ;) Take it > down to 128mb or something and give us some numbers... > _______________________________________________ > tclug-list mailing list > tclug-list at lists.real-time.com > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >